Podcast: How activists and politicians derailed South Australia’s attempt to embrace GMO crops

, | December 4, 2019
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

Australia has grown GMO crops for well over 15 years and reaped the predictable benefits—most notably an 80 percent drop in pesticide use. But the controversy didn’t end after the federal government enacted regulations in 2000 to ensure the safe use of crop biotechnology. Following intense lobbying from environmental activist groups, the state of South Australia implemented a temporary moratorium on GMO crop cultivation in 2004, ostensibly to evaluate concerns that GMO canola could pose a threat to human health.

The ban was supposed to be a temporary measure. However, continued pressure from the organic food industry prompted the state government to enact a series of extensions that kept the moratorium in place well past its scheduled end date. In 2017, the political landscape shifted when a new administration took control of South Australia’s government. Officials examined whether or not the moratorium had served its purpose and ultimately decided to rescind the ban, a move enthusiastically endorsed by many of the state’s farmers.

But local activists connected to Green Party and Labor Party representatives in Parliament derailed the government’s plan and kept the moratorium in place. Minister of Primary Industries and Regional Development Tim Whetstone said on Dec. 3 the last-minute reversal came down to “petty politics” and vowed to introduce legislation to finally rescind the moratorium, which he said harms the state’s economy:

By continuing to leave a moratorium in place the Labor Party are costing farmers in South Australia real money and denying them a basic right – choice. New and improved crop varieties will also help farmers tackle drought and climate change as we look to provide our grain growers with as many tools as possible.

[Editor’s note: The debate over South Australia’s GMO moratorium is ongoing. GLP is monitoring the situation and will post updates as they become available.]

On this episode of Talking Biotech, plant geneticist and host Kevin Folta sits down with Caroline Rhodes, CEO of Grain Producers South Australia. Rhodes breaks down Australia’s complex history with crop biotechnology and explains the playbook local activists use to manipulate politicians with fear, uncertainty and doubt. Ultimately, she says, this is a case of restricting farmer choice for political reasons.

Caroline Rhodes is the CEO of Grain Producers South Australia. Follow her on Twitter @bespoke_rural

Kevin M. Folta is a professor in the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Florida. Follow professor Folta on Twitter @kevinfolta and email your questions to [email protected]

Related article:  Speedy conclusion to US-China 'trade tensions' could foster farming innovation

The Talking Biotech podcast, produced by Kevin Folta, is available for listening or subscription:

Apple Podcasts | Android | Email | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | RSS | Player FM | Pod Directory | TuneIn

The GLP featured this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. The viewpoint is the author’s own. The GLP’s goal is to stimulate constructive discourse on challenging science issues.

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest

podcasts GLP Podcasts More...
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped

video Videos More...
stat hospitalai ink st x mod x

Meet STACI: STAT’s fascinating interactive guide to AI in healthcare

The Covid-19 pandemic underscores the importance of the technology in medicine: In the last few months, hospitals have used AI ...

bees and pollinators Bees & Pollinators More...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...

infographics Infographics More...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...

GMO FAQs GMO FAQs More...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
glp profiles GLP Profiles More...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
report this ad report this ad report this ad

Trending

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend