Why grow GMOs? Over 23 years, biotech crops boosted farm income $225 billion, cut pesticide use and slashed carbon emissions

This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

Farmers who grow biotech crops have earned an additional $225 billion and greatly reduced agriculture’s contribution to climate change, according to a just-released report examining the 22-year period 1996-2018, “GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996-2018.” As added benefits, biotech crop cultivation has limited the expansion of land use for farming and reduced pesticide use by 776 million kilograms, concluded Graham Brookes and Peter Barfoot of PG Economics, a London-based agricultural consulting company. Their research led to the publication of two peer reviewed papers, one on pesticide use and carbon emissions and the other on the impact on farms.

Lower costs, higher yields, wealthier farmers

Through a combination of lower production costs and higher yields, biotech crops have significantly boosted farmer incomes. “The net farm level economic benefit was just under $19 billion in 2018, equal to an average increase in income of $103/hectare,” the researchers wrote. “From 1996 to 2018, the net global farm income benefit was $225 billion, equal to an average increase in income of $96.7/hectare.” Farmers in developing countries earned an extra $4.42 for every dollar invested in biotech seeds, while growers in the US and other developed countries saw a $3.42 profit increase for the same investment.

Commodity crop growers achieved dramatic gains over the two decades examined in the study, due to the impact of insect- and herbicide-resistant seeds, which minimize pesticide costs while effectively controlling destructive insects and weeds. Since 1996, biotech crops have increased corn farmer incomes by just under $60 billion; cotton growers saw a $65.8 billion increase and soy farmers earned an additional $64.2 billion over the same period.

Biotech crops boost sustainable farming

Policymakers and consumers have put increasing pressure on farmers to reduce their carbon emissions as concerns about accelerating climate change mount. Biotech seeds have helped growers adapt to these demands by reducing fossil fuel use and tillage, both of which keep heat-trapping carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. In 2018, for instance, farmers who cultivated genetically engineered crops reduced their CO2 emissions by 23 billion kilotons, the equivalent of pulling 15.3 million cars off the road.

Related article:  Argentina and GMOs: Exploring the nation's long relationship with biotech crops

Concerns have also been raised about the environmental impact of pesticide use in farming, and here too biotech crops have made positive contributions, according to the new report. Overall pesticide use has dropped 8.6 percent since 1996, a reduction of nearly 800 million kilograms that cut the environmental impact of insecticides and herbicides by 19 percent. Insect-resistant seeds, which drastically reduce and sometimes eliminate the need for chemical spraying, were the biggest contributor to this trend.

screen shot at pm

The primary side effect of controlling weeds and insects is higher crop yields, which in turn reduces the amount of land farmers need to cultivate. “Over 23 years of widespread use,” the authors noted, “crop biotechnology has been responsible for the additional global production of 278 million tons of soybeans, 498 million tons of corn, 32.6 million tons of cotton lint and 14 million tons of canola.” Without access to biotech crops, the authors added, American farmers would have had to cultivate an additional 14 percent of the arable land in the United States to maintain 2018 production levels. The finding confirms earlier research showing that biotech crops tend to reduce the amount of farmland required to produce the same amount of food.

According to Brookes, director of PG Economics:

GM crop technology continues to make an important contribution to reducing the environmental footprint of agriculture and securing global food supplies in a sustainable way. It has also helped lift many small, resource-poor farmers and their families in developing countriesout of poverty.

The full report is available here: GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996-2018

Cameron J. English is the GLP’s managing editor. BIO. Follow him on Twitter @camjenglish

Outbreak Daily Digest

podcasts GLP Podcasts More...
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped

video Videos More...
stat hospitalai ink st x mod x

Meet STACI: STAT’s fascinating interactive guide to AI in healthcare

The Covid-19 pandemic underscores the importance of the technology in medicine: In the last few months, hospitals have used AI ...

bees and pollinators Bees & Pollinators More...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...

infographics Infographics More...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...

biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
glp profiles GLP Profiles More...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
report this ad report this ad report this ad


News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend