Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 4;19(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1381-1.

RNA virus interference via CRISPR/Cas13a system in plants

Affiliations
Free PMC article

RNA virus interference via CRISPR/Cas13a system in plants

Rashid Aman et al. Genome Biol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: CRISPR/Cas systems confer immunity against invading nucleic acids and phages in bacteria and archaea. CRISPR/Cas13a (known previously as C2c2) is a class 2 type VI-A ribonuclease capable of targeting and cleaving single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) molecules of the phage genome. Here, we employ CRISPR/Cas13a to engineer interference with an RNA virus, Turnip Mosaic Virus (TuMV), in plants.

Results: CRISPR/Cas13a produces interference against green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing TuMV in transient assays and stable overexpression lines of Nicotiana benthamiana. CRISPR RNA (crRNAs) targeting the HC-Pro and GFP sequences exhibit better interference than those targeting other regions such as coat protein (CP) sequence. Cas13a can also process pre-crRNAs into functional crRNAs.

Conclusions: Our data indicate that CRISPR/Cas13a can be used for engineering interference against RNA viruses, providing a potential novel mechanism for RNA-guided immunity against RNA viruses and for other RNA manipulations in plants.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas systems; CRISPR/Cas13a; Molecular immunity; RNA interference; RNA knockdown; Transcriptome regulation; Virus interference.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Reconstitution of the CRISPR/Cas13a machinery in plants. a Schematic assembly of the plant codon-optimized Cas13a (pCas13a). pCas13a was custom synthesized as four fragments. The F1 (with attL1 and 3x-HA), F2, F3, and F4 (with nls and attL2) fragments were assembled in the cloning vector using a restriction-ligation system. The respective restriction enzymes sites are represented on the top. By LR reaction, pCas13a was moved into the Gateway-compatible binary vector pK2GW7 to make pK2GW7-pCas13a. HA human influenza hemagglutinin epitope tag, nls nuclear localization signal, attL1 and attL2, Gateway cloning recombination sites. b Confirmation of pCas13a expression in transgenic lines. Total protein was extracted from three independent lines of N. benthamiana transformed with pK2GW7-pCas13a. Anti-HA antibody was used to detect HA-tagged pCas13a. The arrow indicates the presence of pCas13a. Wild type (WT) was used as a negative control. c The TuMV-GFP genome with selected targets. The arrowheads indicate the four selected sites. The lower panel represents the target RNA sequences paired with their respective crRNAs. PFS protospacer flanking site. d Expression of the crRNA from the TRV system. The repeat-guide DNA sequences were cloned under the PEBV promoter in RNA2 of TRV for constitutive and systemic expression. e Diagrammatic representation of the pCas13–crRNA–target complex. The targeting complex pCas13a–crRNA (repeat sequence-n28, guide RNA-n28) bound to the RNA target n28 for interference
Fig. 2
The pCas13a–crRNA complex interferes with TuMV-GFP in planta. a pCas13a mediates interference with the GFP-expressing TuMV virus in plants. N. benthamiana plants expressing pCas13a were infiltrated with TRV expressing crRNAs and TuMV-GFP. At 7 dpi, plants were imaged under UV light for GFP. The GFP signal of the plants having target crRNAs were compared to plants having no crRNA or a ns-crRNA. b GFP protein detection was used to validate the TuMV-GFP interference. Protein blots from (a) were developed with anti-GFP antibody. The arrow indicates the size of the GFP band. c Northern blot confirms that Hc-crRNA and GFP2-crRNA give better interference with TuMV. RNA blots from (a) were probed with a DIG-labeled TuMV complementary (250-nt) RNA fragment and detected with anti-DIG antibody. The arrow indicates the accumulation of the TuMV RNA genome. In (b) and (c) the lower panels were used as loading controls
Fig. 3
pCas13a-processed poly-crRNA mediates interference with TuMV-GFP. a Schematic of the cleavage of poly-crRNA by pCas13a. Rectangles denote the spacer sequences and solid lines denote repeat elements. The predicted cleavage sites are depicted. b Northern blot for pCas13a-mediated cleavage of poly-crRNA. RNA blot from two independent transgenic lines of pCas13a (L-9 and L-6) infiltrated with TRV RNA1 and RNA2 expressing specific poly-crRNA and a ns-poly-crRNA and TuMV-GFP. The RNA blot was probed and detected with a DIG-labeled 28-nt RNA fragment against the repeat sequence. The arrow indicates the processed crRNA (56 nt) in L-9 from both ns-poly-crRNA and poly-crRNA compared to WT N. benthamiana. In L-6, the processed crRNA level from poly-crRNA remained under the detection level. The synthetic crRNA (56 nt) was used as an experimental control. c GFP signal data demonstrating the poly-crRNA-mediated interference against TuMV-GFP. pCas13a transgenic N. benthamiana plants infiltrated with TRV expressing poly-crRNA (three crRNAs) and TuMV-GFP were imaged under UV light for GFP at 7 dpi. The GFP signal of the plants expressing poly-crRNAs were compared to plants expressing ns-poly-crRNA or empty vector control. d GFP quantification of poly-crRNA-mediated viral interference. The GFP signal (n = 5) data were used for the generation of a percentile graph. The GFP signal of the plants inoculated with TuMV-GFP and empty vector control were used as a reference. e Northern blot showing the poly-crRNA-based interference against TuMV-GFP. RNA blots were probed with the DIG-labeled RNA fragment and developed with anti-DIG antibody. The arrow indicates the accumulation of the TuMV RNA genome. f Western blot to confirm the TuMV-GFP interference by poly-crRNA. Protein blots from the poly-crRNA and ns-poly-crRNA were detected for GFP with anti-gfp antibody. ns-poly-crRNA and plants inoculated with only TuMV-GFP were used as control. In (e) and (f), the lower panels were used as loading controls

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 52 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Barrangou R, Marraffini LA. CRISPR-Cas systems: Prokaryotes upgrade to adaptive immunity. Mol Cell. 2014;54(2):234–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA. RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature. 2012;482(7385):331–8. doi: 10.1038/nature10886. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science. 2007;315(5819):1709–12. doi: 10.1126/science.1138140. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Oost J, Westra ER, Jackson RN, Widenheft B. Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(7):479–92. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3279. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Makarova KS, Haft DH, Barrangou R, Brouns SJ, Charpentier E, Horvath P, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(6):467–77. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2577. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

Feedback