Visitors   Views   Downloads

Relative toxicity of herbicide use in the United States 1990 to 2015

View preprint
1177 days ago
RT @BioBeef: @sharonroney @mem_somerville @kevinfolta @edgeben I think @WyoWeeds does the best job answering that question "acute toxicity…
@sharonroney @mem_somerville @kevinfolta @edgeben I think @WyoWeeds does the best job answering that question "acute toxicity hazard decreased in 5 out of 6 crops"
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Funding has been provided to the University of Wyoming from the following organizations in support of Dr. Kniss's research and education program, either through unrestricted gifts, research contracts, or grants: Arysta LifeScience, BASF, Bayer CropScience, Dow AgroSciences, DuPont, FMC, Hatch Act Funds – USDA, Loveland Industries, Monsanto, NovaSource, Repar Corporation, StateLine Bean Cooperative, Syngenta, USDA National Insitute for Food and Agriculture, University of Wyoming Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming School of Energy Resources, Valent, Western Sugar Cooperative, Winfield Solutions, Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station, Wyoming Crop Improvement Association, Wyoming Department of Agriculture, and Wyoming Seed Certification. Dr. Kniss currently serves as Member at Large on the Weed Science Society of America Board of Directors.

Author Contributions

Andrew R Kniss conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data will be deposited at the time of publication. Repository will depend on where the manuscript is accepted.


The author received no specific funding for this work.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies