It has taken nearly six years, detours for bitter legal challenges, and tens of millions of dollars in legal fees, but the foundational CRISPR-Cas9 patent for which the University of California applied in March 2013 will soon be granted, according to documents posted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Friday, throwing yet another monkey wrench into genome editing’s tangled IP landscape.

Based on the pioneering research of UC Berkeley biochemist Jennifer Doudna, Emmanuelle Charpentier (of Sweden’s Umea University at the time of the key study), and their colleagues, the ‘859 patent, as aficionados fondly call it, covers the use of CRISPR, in particular a single molecule of RNA acting as a genome-sniffing bloodhound, paired with the Cas9 DNA-cutting enzyme to edit genomes. The patent office’s “notice of allowance” means that the patent will be issued in about six to eight weeks.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!


What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • STAT+ Conversations
  • Weekly opportunities to engage with our reporters and leading industry experts in live video conversations
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.
  • This is like patenting the discovery of penicillin. It would set humanity back. Tell her thank you. Build her a monument. And envite her to all the parties. Now, let those with the imagination and knowledge to build our tomorrow.

    • No, it’s not. It is the invention of a new and useful technology. Without the patent system, who would fund making these inventions? Basically, you are proposing that we do not have such inventions. That was the viewpoint of the Luddites, who wanted to live in the world of the past without new inventions.

Comments are closed.

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy