Greening of the Earth and its drivers


Global environmental change is rapidly altering the dynamics of terrestrial vegetation, with consequences for the functioning of the Earth system and provision of ecosystem services1,2. Yet how global vegetation is responding to the changing environment is not well established. Here we use three long-term satellite leaf area index (LAI) records and ten global ecosystem models to investigate four key drivers of LAI trends during 1982–2009. We show a persistent and widespread increase of growing season integrated LAI (greening) over 25% to 50% of the global vegetated area, whereas less than 4% of the globe shows decreasing LAI (browning). Factorial simulations with multiple global ecosystem models suggest that CO2 fertilization effects explain 70% of the observed greening trend, followed by nitrogen deposition (9%), climate change (8%) and land cover change (LCC) (4%). CO2 fertilization effects explain most of the greening trends in the tropics, whereas climate change resulted in greening of the high latitudes and the Tibetan Plateau. LCC contributed most to the regional greening observed in southeast China and the eastern United States. The regional effects of unexplained factors suggest that the next generation of ecosystem models will need to explore the impacts of forest demography, differences in regional management intensities for cropland and pastures, and other emerging productivity constraints such as phosphorus availability.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Trend in observed growing season integrated LAI.
Figure 2: Attribution of trend in growing season integrated LAI.
Figure 3: Spatial pattern of dominant drivers of trend in growing season integrated LAI.


  1. 1

    Peters, G. P. et al. The challenge to keep global warming below 2°. Nature Clim. Change 3, 4–6 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Ciais, P. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Myneni, R. B., Keeling, C. D., Tucker, C. J., Asrar, G. & Nemani, R. R. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386, 698–702 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Xu, L. et al. Temperature and vegetation seasonality diminishment over northern lands. Nature Clim. Change 3, 581–586 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Los, S. O. Analysis of trends in fused AVHRR and MODIS NDVI data for 1982–2006: indication for a CO2 fertilization effect in global vegetation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 318–330 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Mao, J. F. et al. Global latitudinal-asymmetric vegetation growth trends and their driving mechanisms: 1982–2009. Remote Sens. 5, 1484–1497 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Piao, S. et al. Detection and attribution of vegetation greening trend in China over the last 30 years. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1601–1609 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Wang, X. H. et al. A two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variations. Nature 506, 212–215 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Malhi, Y. et al. Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319, 169–172 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Ukkola, A. M. et al. Reduced streamflow in water-stressed climates consistent with CO2 effects on vegetation. Nature Clim. Change 6, 75–78 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Piao, S. L. et al. Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2117–2132 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Allen, M. R. & Tett, S. F. B. Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting. Clim. Dynam. 15, 419–434 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Norby, R. J. et al. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18052–18056 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B. & Fisher, J. B. Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 436–441 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Galloway, J. N. et al. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70, 153–226 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Donohue, R. J., Roderick, M. L., McVicar, T. R. & Farquhar, G. D. Impact of CO2 fertilization on maximum foliage cover across the globe’s warm, arid environments. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3031–3035 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Wong, S. C., Cowan, I. R. & Farquhar, G. D. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282, 424–426 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Achard, F. et al. Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science 297, 999–1002 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Gibson, L. et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478, 378–381 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    LeBauer, D. S. & Treseder, K. K. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 89, 371–379 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Magnani, F. et al. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature 447, 848–850 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Canadell, J. G. & Schulze, E. D. Global potential of biospheric carbon management for climate mitigation. Nature Commun. 5, 5282 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Goulding, K. W. T. et al. Nitrogen deposition and its contribution to nitrogen cycling and associated soil processes. New Phytol. 139, 49–58 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Holland, E. A., Braswell, B. H., Sulzman, J. & Lamarque, J. F. Nitrogen deposition onto the United States and western Europe: synthesis of observations and models. Ecol. Appl. 15, 38–57 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Mueller, T. et al. Human land-use practices lead to global long-term increases in photosynthetic capacity. Remote Sens. 6, 5717–5731 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Lehner, B. & Döll, P. Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J. Hydrol. 296, 1–22 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    van der Werf, G. R. et al. Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11707–11735 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Zhu, Z. C. et al. Global data sets of vegetation leaf area index (LAI)3g and fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR)3g derived from global inventory modeling and mapping studies (GIMMS) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI3g) for the period 1981 to 2011. Remote Sens. 5, 927–948 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Kim, Y., Kimball, J. S., McDonald, K. C. & Glassy, J. Developing a global data record of daily landscape freeze/thaw status using satellite passive microwave remote sensing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 49, 949–960 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant XDB03030404), National Basic Research Program of China (Grant 2013CB956303), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 41530528), the 111 Project (Grant B14001), and the European Research Council Synergy grant ERC-SyG-610028 IMBALANCE-P. We thank all people and institutions who provided data used in this study, in particular, the TRENDY modelling group. R.B.M. is funded by NASA Earth Science. J.G.C. is grateful for support from the Australian Climate Change Science Program. A.A. and T.A.M.P. acknowledge support through EC FP7 grants LUC4C (Grant 603542) and EMBRACE (Grant 282672) and the Helmholtz Association ATMO programme, Y.W. acknowledges CSIRO strategic funding for CABLE science, E.K. was funded by ERTDF (S10) from the Ministry of Environment, Japan. J.M. is supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-BATTELLE for DOE under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. B.D.S. is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation and FP7 funding through project EMBRACE (282672).

Author information




S.Piao, R.B.M. and Z.Zhu designed the study. Z.Zhu performed the analysis. Z.Zhu, S.Piao, J.G.C., P.C. and R.B.M. drafted the paper. Z.Zhu, M.H., Z.Zeng, C.C., Y.Liu, H.Y., X.W., X.L., Y.P., Y.Li, R.L. and Z.X. collected data and prepared figures. S.S., P.F., A.A., B.D.S., B.P., C.K., E.K., J.M., J.P., L.C., N.V., N.Z., S.Peng, S.Z., T.A.M.P., and Y.W. ran the model simulations. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and to the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilong Piao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 4791 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, Z., Piao, S., Myneni, R. et al. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nature Clim Change 6, 791–795 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading