What are the implications of the ‘bad luck’ cancer study?

| | January 6, 2015
Skull CT scan picture on the wall in perspective
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

It’s not every day that a scientific paper forces us to re-examine long-held views on a topic of great importance. Such a paper came out last week in the journal Science.

In the space of two-and-a-half pages, the mathematician Cristian Tomasetti and cancer geneticist Bert Vogelstein of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine present an elegant and thought-provoking analysis that may require revision of the reigning hypothesis of the past forty years, according to which most cancers are primarily due to mutations which are either inherited or caused by environmental exposures, such as smoking or certain viruses.

The starting-point for the analysis is the observation that the frequency at which cancer occurs in different tissues throughout the body varies dramatically. For example, cancer occurrence within the alimentary tract can vary by a factor of twenty-four (highest for the large intestine, lowest for the small intestine). There is more than a million-fold difference between the most common and the least common cancers occurring in humans. Such differences can’t be explained by differences in exposure to carcinogenic substances or by hereditary factors.

The authors posited that some proportion of cancers were due simply to random errors that occur during cell division when the genetic material (DNA) is copied. However, they reasoned that, since the stem cells, which maintain the architecture of different tissues, are much longer-lived than the majority of cells making up an organ, it is mutations in stem cells that are most likely to contribute to cancer.

If this is true, they reasoned, the number of stem cell divisions in a particular tissue over a human lifetime should be positively correlated with the lifetime risk of developing cancer in that organ. The researchers gathered the most reliable information available from previous research on stem cell number and divisions for 31 different tissues. Information on stem cell divisions was then plotted against data on cancer incidence in the U.S. (However, reliable stem cell data were not available for several tissue types, which happen to be tissues associated with common cancers, including breast, cervix, endometrium, prostate, bladder, and kidney).

Read full, original article: Most Cancers May Simply Be Due To Bad Luck

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest

podcasts GLP Podcasts More...
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped

video Videos More...
stat hospitalai ink st x mod x

Meet STACI: STAT’s fascinating interactive guide to AI in healthcare

The Covid-19 pandemic underscores the importance of the technology in medicine: In the last few months, hospitals have used AI ...

bees and pollinators Bees & Pollinators More...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...

infographics Infographics More...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...

GMO FAQs GMO FAQs More...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
glp profiles GLP Profiles More...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
report this ad report this ad report this ad

Trending

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend