New York Times publishes emails of Charles Benbrook, paid organic consultant who produced ‘industry talking points’

| October 5, 2015
Charles Benbrook, formerly research adjunct professor at Washington State University
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Charles M. Benbrook, formerly chief scientist at the Organic Center, left the organization in 2012 after concluding that he could get more traction for his research, which has questioned G.M.O. crop safety, by joining a university.

Benbrook set up his program at Washington State, with funding from companies including Whole Foods, Organic Valley, United Natural Foods and Stonyfield Farm. His research examined the benefits of organic foods and potential risks associated with GMOs.

Benbrook’s research became a central talking point for organizations that have advocated GMO labeling, including the nonprofit group Just Label It.

[The Genes and Science has a background analysis of Benbrook’s history and research available here. A full 100 percent of the former professor’s research at WSU was funded by the organic industry — and that research is now the centerpiece of claims by the organic industry and used by Just Label It and other anti-GMO lobbyists to provide academic support for their campaigns.]

Just as agricultural biotech giants recruit academics to help block mandatory labeling, the organic industry does the same. Benbrook and others were asked to participate in a meeting with Walmart in an effort to persuade the company to back the labeling effort.

Related article:  Big Organic and Big Ag both fund expenses, research as GMO debate intensifies

Benbrook also joined an effort to challenge approval of a new Dow Chemical product for use with GM crops. Again, Just Label It used third-party scholars as a lobbying tool. Dow Chemical also asked an academic to write the U.S.D.A. in support of the product’s approval.

The New England Journal of Medicine published an article, co-authored by Benbrook, raising health questions about G.M.O. crops. The piece drew questions about Benbrook’s conflict-of-interest disclosure. He later concedes that his financial relationship with G.M.O. critics should have been disclosed.

We provide a sampling of emails obtained through an open records request by The Times, showing how Benbrook, even while at Washington State, continued to work closely with organic industry including Organic Valley, and the Organic Center.

To view documents and emails and read full, original post see: Washington State Professor Allies With Organics Industry

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest

podcasts GLP Podcasts More...
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped

video Videos More...
stat hospitalai ink st x mod x

Meet STACI: STAT’s fascinating interactive guide to AI in healthcare

The Covid-19 pandemic underscores the importance of the technology in medicine: In the last few months, hospitals have used AI ...

bees and pollinators Bees & Pollinators More...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...

infographics Infographics More...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...

GMO FAQs GMO FAQs More...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
glp profiles GLP Profiles More...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
report this ad report this ad report this ad

Trending

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend