Geoffrey Kabat’s ‘Getting Risk Right’ on science media and good vs. poor quality studies

This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

In Getting Risk Right: Understanding the Science of Elusive Health Risks…looking across the current landscape of environmental epidemiologic research and communication of its findings, [Dr. Geoffrey Kabat] sees shining successes, illustrated by the establishment of human papillomavirus as the cause of cervical cancer and of specific herbal remedies as causes of nephropathy. He contrasts those 2 case studies with 2 heavily studied and far murkier topics—cellular phones and endocrine dis- ruptors. Addressing a wide audience, Kabat shows that it is difficult to find real causes of disease and critical to insist on scientific rigor in looking for them. He urges his fellow epi- demiologists to use higher standards, including quantitative attention to dose-specific risks, explicit recognition of uncertainty, and sensible weighing of plausible harms and benefits. Journal readers may weigh the evidence on a particular topic differently, but they will agree with the clarion call for rigor and reason.

The problems Kabat describes are enormous and not “just academic.” Bad public policy is enacted and valuable research energy wasted because some epidemiologic topics stay active long after they have been settled.


We know that journalists and, certainly, the public tend to think that a “study is a study” and “an association is an association.” But, as epidemiologists, we should be more critical than we have been, especially in areas [in which] the study design and methods are weak and, at the same time, [in which] due to “human interest,” results are likely to attract the public’s attention. So, when one reviews studies [in which] the meth- odology is weaker, it is imperative to keep this “big picture” consideration in mind. My impression is that it is often lost sight of.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: Getting Risk Right – Understanding the Science of Elusive Health Risks

Outbreak Daily Digest

podcasts GLP Podcasts More...
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped

video Videos More...
stat hospitalai ink st x mod x

Meet STACI: STAT’s fascinating interactive guide to AI in healthcare

The Covid-19 pandemic underscores the importance of the technology in medicine: In the last few months, hospitals have used AI ...

bees and pollinators Bees & Pollinators More...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...

infographics Infographics More...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...

biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
glp profiles GLP Profiles More...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
report this ad report this ad report this ad


News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend